explicit_trade
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| explicit_trade [2018/11/20 13:39] – [Explicit trade] freeworlder | explicit_trade [Unknown date] (current) – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Explicit trade ====== | ||
| - | {{ : | ||
| - | |||
| - | While there' | ||
| - | * an exchange not taking place, or | ||
| - | * one party to the transaction having to engage in some activity to meet the value requirement that they might otherwise not engage in. (eg. working long hours in an unfulfilling job to pay off a debt) | ||
| - | |||
| - | An open access economy would not preclude the notion of explicit trade taking place. In fact, it is a perfectly satisfactory way for two people to obtain things that they would like to have. However, when it comes to life's basic necessities like food, water, a home, clothing etc, no-one should be denied access due to inability to meet some value requirement. | ||
| - | ===== Implicit trade ===== | ||
| - | {{ : | ||
| - | |||
| - | All things being equal, most people will try and settle an implied debt despite the fact that there is no obligation to do so. The OAE theory holds that communities can successfully operate through a circular, implicit debt program, which means that the implicit urge to pay back in to the community at least equals favours received. | ||
explicit_trade.1542721148.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/08/04 06:11 (external edit)